05 December 2007

Consumer watchdog Energywatch has claimed that people without bank accounts cannot take advantage of cheaper tariffs.
The accusations arise from the fact that customers with pre-payment meters pay on average of £195 more a year for their energy than those paying by direct debit. On the higher end of the scale, some customers pay £304 more a year by using a pre-payment system.
Those who use online tariffs and pay by direct debit can get the cheapest deals.
Pre-payment meters offer a solution for those that prefer to budget their money and pay as they go rather than face a large bill at the end of the month or quarter. However, it has been reported that some people have no other option than to use a meter because they do not have bank accounts.
Allan Asher, chief executive of Energywatch said: “That they should ramp up the rates and exploit those with no access to alternative payment methods is morally bankrupt.”
There are 5.7 million energy pre-payment meters in Britain, which are common in rented accommodation and holiday homes. According to the industry regulator, Ofgem, pre-payment meters are installed by energy companies for those customers who have problems managing their energy bills.
Energywatch claims that:
• The number of meters installed is rising due to soaring energy bills (580,000 were installed in 2006)
• 63% of meters in 2006 were installed to recover debts, limiting the ability of those households to switch to cheaper suppliers and payment methods
• Pre-payment tariffs are more expensive to cover meter maintenance and the payment system
Ofgem calculations indicate that it costs £85 extra per household to supply energy via a pre-payment system. However, Energywatch argue that the industry is making nearly £300m a year from customers on such meters even when taking this cost into account.
‹ Back